Antimicrobial effects of clindamycin-loaded platelet-rich fibrin (PRF).

OBJECTIVES: Recent research has demonstrated that platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is an appropriate carrier for ampicillin/sulbactam. The aim of the study was to investigate whether PRF is also a suitable bio-carrier for clindamycin (CLI). METHODS: PRF membranes were produced from 36 patients receiving intravenous therapy with CLI (e.g. due to the diagnosis of an osteonecrosis of the jaw or infections). Concentrations of CLI in PRF membranes were measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the antimicrobial effects were investigated in vitro in agar diffusion tests with fresh PRF and PRF stored for 24 h. Storage was performed in an incubator at 36 °C to simulate the in-vivo situation. RESULTS: The mean concentration of CLI in plasma was 1.0 ± 0.3 µg/100 mg plasma; in resulting PRF membranes 0.7 ± 0.4 µg/100 mg PRF. Agar diffusion tests were performed with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus mitis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Mean inhibition zones, in mm, for fresh PRF were 17.3, 12.2, 18.8, 17.1, 25.8 and 18.1, 12.7, 19.2, 17.3, and 26.3 for stored PRF, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that PRF is a suitable bio-carrier for CLI when administered systemically to patients. The concentration in PRF generated from patients after infusion of 600 mg CLI dose suffices to target clinically relevant bacteria. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using PRF as a carrier for local antibiotic application can prevent infections in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Within the study limitations, the findings could expand the scope of PRF application by adding CLI as a new antibiotic to the spectrum of PRF therapy.

Impact of aminopenicillin administration routes on antimicrobial effects of platelet-rich fibrin: An in-vitro investigation.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of different aminopenicillin administration routes on the antimicrobial effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). METHODS: We enrolled patients undergoing treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) orally or ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM) intravenously. AMC was applied in a single oral dose (875/125 mg), or in a double oral dose (1750/250 mg), and SAM in a dose of 2000/1000 mg. Blood was obtained one hour after the intake of AMC or 15 min after the infusion of SAM ended. Antimicrobial effects were investigated in agar diffusion tests with fresh PRF, PRF stored for 24, and PRF stored for 48 h. Agar diffusion tests were performed with Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Inhibition zones (IZs) around a 6 mm PRF disc were measured after 24 h. RESULTS: IZs for fresh PRF and the single oral dose of AMC were 0.0, 4.7, 15.2, 2.3, and 0.9 mm (E. coli, S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and P. gingivalis, respectively). For the double oral dose, these values were 0.0, 11.4, 20.0, 8.1, and 7.4 mm. IZs for SAM were 11.9, 18.2, 24.7, 20.3, and 22.1 mm. Differences between parenteral and oral application as well as between different oral doses were significant (p<0.0001, one-way ANOVA). DISCUSSION: The results of our study demonstrate that oral administration is a suitable route to load PRF with these drugs. This could expand the scope of PRF application to prevent infections at the surgical site, especially in an outpatient setting in which drugs are normally applied orally.

Investigation of three common centrifugation protocols for platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as a bio-carrier for ampicillin/sulbactam: a prospective trial.

OBJECTIVES: Different platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) protocols exist and are known to differ in resulting mechanical and bioactive properties. Centrifugation parameters may also influence drug release, in particular antibiotics, when using PRF as a bio-carrier. We thus evaluated three common protocols regarding effects on the bio-carrier properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective trial comprising 33 patients, we compared different protocols for PRF as a bio-carrier for ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM). Blood samples were taken shortly after a single dose of ampicillin/sulbactam (2 g/1 g) was administered to patients intravenously. PRF was obtained by centrifugation and three protocols were used: protocol A (1300 rpm, 8 min, RCF-max = 208 g), B (2300 rpm, 12 min, RCF-max = 652 g), and C (1500 rpm, 14 min, RCF-max = 276 g). The antibacterial activity of PRF was investigated against five oral species in vitro, based on agar diffusion methodology. RESULTS: The study demonstrates that a single dose of SAM is sufficient to reach high concentrations in PRF in all protocols (150 µg/ml), which is comparable to the plasma SAM concentration. Antibacterial activity was inferred from the diameter of inhibition zones seen in agar diffusion tests using PRF discs. Protocol B resulted in the largest inhibition zones. One-way ANOVA revealed statistically improved results for protocol B for some bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides valuable data on PRF antibiotic enrichment, notably SAM. A single dose of SAM is sufficient to reach clinically relevant concentrations in PRF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings potentially extend the application of PRF, for example in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw or in oral surgery (e.g., stick bone).